Stephen Jay Gould, by Kathy Chapman online
Stephen Jay Gould (September 10, 1941 – May 20, 2002) was an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, a historian of science, and a critic of Velikovsky:
- "... Velikovsky is neither crank nor charlatan — although to state my opinion and to quote one of my colleagues, he is at least gloriously wrong.
- "Worlds in Collision published twenty-five years ago, continues to engender intense debate. It also has spawned a series of issues peripheral to the purely scientific arguments. Velikovsky was surely ill treated by certain academics who sought to suppress the publication of his work. But a man does not attain the status of Galileo merely because he is persecuted; he must also be right. The scientific and sociological issues are separate. And then, times and treatment of heretics have changed. Bruno burned to death; Galileo, after viewing the instruments of torture, languished under house arrest. Velikovsky won both publicity and royalties. Torquemada was evil; Velikovsky's academic enemies, merely foolish."
Trevor Palmer notes why Stephen Jay Gould believed Velikovsky was wrong:
- ".. according to Stephen Jay Gould, there were many other reasons: one was Velikovsky's assumption `that similarity of form reflects simultaneity of occurrence', which led him to think that all the fossil fish found throughout hundreds of feet of Old Red Sandstone deposits (from the Devonian Period) had died in a single catastrophe, even seeing evidence of this catastrophe in facial expressions and body contortions of individual fossils; another was his assumption `that events are sudden because their effects are large'; yet another was the unjustified `inference of worldwide events from local catastrophes'; a fourth was `the exclusive use of outdated sources' (most of his references were dated before 1940, with many a good deal before); then there was Velikovsky's `carelessness, inaccuracy, and sleight of hand', including his assertion that no fossils are forming today, whereas `anyone who has dug old bones from lake beds or shells from beaches knows that this claim is simply absurd'; and finally, there was Velikovsky's rejection of continental drift as a possible explanation for geological features, just as a revolution was about to take place which brought this hitherto minority view into general favour, as a result of `the verification of sea-floor spreading' [30: pp. 153-167].
Comparison with Velikovsky
Kronos Editor-in-Chief Lewis M. Greenberg has written:
- "Stephen Jay Gould [..] is almost a closet Velikovskian. Gould's theory (along with Niles Eldredge) of "punctuated equilibria" (see G.R. Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, pp. 6ff.) is basically a variant of the "cataclysmic evolution" first proposed by Velikovsky in Earth in Upheaval."
- ↑ Stephen Jay Gould, "Velikovsky in Collision", Natural History, March 1975; Reprinted in Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1977, pp. 153-159
- ↑ S. J. Gould, Ever Since Darwin (Burnett Books, London, 1978; Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1980)
- ↑ Trevor Palmer, "Chapter 3: Challenges to Evolutionary Gradualism" Catastrophism, Neocatastrophism and Evolution , Society for Interdisciplinary Studies in association with the Nottingham Trent University (1994), ISBN 0951430718.
- ↑ Gordon Rattray Taylor, Great Evolution Mystery (, Secker & Warburg (Feb 1983) ISBN 0436516330